The Maorification of New Zealand
The subversion and destruction of national sovereignty and constitutional order by means of mass immigration and the criminalizing of free speech is the primary objective of globalism. While it is on full display in most of the Western world, its progress in New Zealand is hardly known.
Since it would expose globalist intentions, the Maorification of New Zealand is not a topic aired by the mass media. But it is exposed in detail by the New Zealand Centre for Political Research, headed by Dr Muriel Newman and on the Te Parti Maori Party website.
Although the Maoris constitute only 20% of the population, since 1990, a process from within the state sector has been incrementally elevating Maori ideology and influence. Through the Office of Maori-Crown Relations, Matauranga Maori (Maori ways of knowing) has acquired suasion in health, education, law and all public policy.
The ideological groundwork of Matauranga Maori was laid in the 1970s by two activists, Donna Huata and Ripeka Evans. They visited Cuba to learn revolutionary means by which Aotearoa (New Zealand) can be transformed into a Maori nation state.
Matauranga Māori now enjoys equal partnership and inclusion in Western curricula across a wide spectrum. From that platform, Maori activists have challenged and reformed minds, demonising resistance and opposition as racism. Despite the Maori history of tribal warfare, slavery and cannibalism, their narrative is premised on grievance and victimhood attributed to colonial oppression.
The website of Te Pati Maori in Parliament is unambiguous in its vision. Citing the 1840 resolution of “our tupana”, it declares: “We will force the Crown to return our land…. All land sales to foreign interests to be replaced by leasehold only…. All official names will be in Maori.”
The extent of what is effectively state capture is reflected in references to Maori culture in all facets of New Zealand life – sport, culture, school, university, the mass media, the private sector and all state institutions and agencies. Just as B-BBEE is unconstitutionally a tool of racial discrimination, so in New Zealand, beneficial preference is prioritised for Maori interests wherever feasible in what might be called MMEE –Meliorating Maori Economic Empowerment.
As has occurred in Gauteng with the expropriation of a 34-hectare property (406 of the Farm Driefontein) without compensation, state land is being transferred to private Maori tribal corporations in quiet fulfilment of the aim of Aotearoa being repossessed by Maori.
Race-based victimhood serves as an easy tool whereby the Orwellian globalists subvert nations and install puppet governments leashed to their narratives. In New Zealand, the goal of Maorification is endorsed by the Labour and Green Parties. In South Africa, globalism’s allies are all those who misguidedly endorse the servitude of the Freedom Charter.
Whereas white minority rule of South Africa was bitterly opposed as racist, ironically, that is not the case in New Zealand, where racist minority Maori rule is the globalists’ objective. While historically that may seem inconsistent, what needs to be appreciated is that democracy has no place in globalism’s dystopia, where all power is the sole preserve of a ruthless oligarchy.
