Listening to what Tony Blair recently had to say at a World Economic Forum meeting, it is obvious that unelected World leaders with serious financial clout are coming together, pretending to be speaking on behalf of the Global population about future Healthcare initiatives and digitalization of the sector as a whole. Their reasons for wanting to do this? Well, as they try to state so politically and intellectually: preparing for future Pandemics in light of these so-called ‘poly crises’- let us remember that Covid 19 was nothing more than a very irresponsible experiment which went horribly wrong at a Wuhan lab, whilst people like Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates, together with the World Health organization, are still walking free and making recommendations!

So far, there has been zero accountability for these doctors, philanthropists and filthy rich individuals who opened Pandora’s box in 2020, in order to scare us into obedience.

We are closer now to complete digital enslavement than ever before! As Blair also stated, the World has to be better prepared for any future health crises and to do so, they are apparently planning to completely digitize Healthcare, and provide us with multiple vaccinations and shots to ‘protect’ us from inevitable disasters. After seeing the stats on the disastrous aftereffects of the COVID jabs, how could anyone ever take another shot?

I recently discovered that when the human body is injected with any foreign material, especially mRNA or another species’ DNA, the body’s natural response is to fight that foreign object or material in order to work it out of our system- this is by God’s design, for us to realise that everything in nature, which is not man-made, is there to heal us, not harm us. The same goes for organ transplants- when organs are transplanted into the human body from another person, the body will resist it at all costs; therefore doctors provide medication which stops the body from fighting back- this, in my view, is a perfect example of humans trying to play God, and to dishonor His grand design.

You see, my fellow readers, your body was not designed to have fetal matter, other species’ DNA or any such foreign objects injected into our system! This is gene therapy, not vaccination! We have to be so careful, in future, to willingly give away our health and freedom to these Globalist bullies, when we do not understand what they are planning to do. Individuals such as Tony Blair, Bill Gates, Ursula von Der Leyen, Klaus Schwab and Tedros Ghebreyesus do not have your best interest at heart! Big Pharma, along with Pfizer, Moderna and other foundations, have become stinking rich overnight through our own sheepish behavior!

What are you going to do if by 2030 the government says to you that if you are not fully vaccinated, you are not permitted to buy, travel, shop or do anything? Will you comply? Will you be willing to become shackled by a digital system in order for these Global criminals to play games with you and watch us give away our freedoms, our wealth, as they carefully redistribute our funds to enrich themselves even more? How many more shots are you willing to take? How many more masks will you buy? Or medication to help fight the aftereffects of these harmful jabs? Or how much more enslavement can you endure? We simply cannot be fooled like this again! Not ever! 2020, and everything that took place around that dreaded pandemic, should never have to happen again- all we have to do is say NO!

The post Are Vaccines A Biological Weapon? appeared first on Alt News Network.

Since the global rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations, societal divisions have deepened, and within the medical fraternity, tensions have escalated. Dr. Chetty, hailed for his dedication to patient care and adherence to the Hippocratic Oath, found himself at the centre of controversy as he prioritised individual treatment over mandated protocols.

Treating over 14,000 COVID-19 patients, Dr. Chetty achieved remarkable results—none of his patients required hospitalisation or succumbed to the virus. Yet, despite his success, he faced a barrage of attacks and disciplinary action from the HPCSA, accused of professional misconduct for not conforming to recommended vaccination protocols.

Critics argue that Dr Chetty’s persecution is not based on ethical violations but rather stems from his refusal to toe the official line dictated by governments and pharmaceutical companies. They point to the HPCSA’s charge against Dr. Chetty as evidence of a politically motivated agenda, highlighting the council’s failure to acknowledge his groundbreaking research and lifesaving treatments.

In response to the growing outcry, voices from within and outside the medical community have rallied in support of Dr. Chetty, condemning the actions of the HPCSA and demanding a fair assessment of his contributions to healthcare. Calls for transparency and accountability resonate as concerns about the suppression of alternative treatment approaches and the erosion of medical freedoms mount.

As the controversy surrounding Dr. Chetty intensifies, it is a stark reminder of the delicate balance between medical autonomy and institutional oversight. In a climate marked by uncertainty and fear, the plight of doctors like Dr. Chetty underscores the importance of upholding principles of integrity, compassion, and scientific inquiry in the pursuit of public health.

The post Persecution of Doctor Sparks Outcry: Health Council Accused of Political Motives appeared first on Alt News Network.

The refrain of the HPCSA and its sibling, the SA Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), has been to “follow the science” regarding COVID treatment and the so-called vaccine. But as irrefutable evidence now shows, they were complying with the moneyed interest of Big Pharma, not science.

In charging Dr Chetty with casting aspersions on medical practitioners for saying they “engineered “ protocols that caused the deaths of COVID patients, the HPCSA exposes its ignorance of Remdesvir, which was routinely prescribed in terms of HPCSA protocol. Tests done on this drug in 2019 found that it was so dangerous that it was immediately withdrawn because of the 16 critical effects it inflicted on the heart and lungs (see: Robert F Kennedy’s The Defender, May 17, 2023).

Suppression of the truth about Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin, which Dr Chetty endorsed as effective in treating the COVID virus, was a major theme of Big Pharma and those in the medical profession in thrall to the dictates of money at the expense of science.

Dismissed as the equivalent of “bleach” by Big Pharma and its mass media allies, HCQ was endorsed by Canadian government scientists in 2005 for its efficacy in combating the Sars Coronavirus (see: The Defender, February 23, 2022).  Ivermectin has a 50-year safety record and is one of the most peer-reviewed medications for the inhibition of viruses. Uttar Pradesh state in India used ivermectin exclusively in the treatment of Covid with a 98,7% recovery rate (see: World Net Daily, September 15, 2021).

Significantly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US has been compelled by a lawsuit to remove posts on its webpage condemning ivermectin as a “horse medication.” This comes after doctors argued that it was unlawful to impose on their authority and professional patient relationship (see: Breitbart News, March 25, 2024).

As for the much-touted vaccine, in a court case in the Pretoria High Court a year ago, Pfizer admitted that the mRNA in its Covid vaccine “is unsafe and ineffective.” In terms of the health havoc the so-called COVID vaccines are causing, Pfizer’s concession is a monumental understatement.

Between 2020 and 2023, mortality rates in the US increased by 22%. Miscarriages are up 15%. (see: The Defender, November 6, 2023). The New Zealand Herald of March 23, 2023, reported the biggest increase in deaths in 100 years. Australia, Italy, Germany, and Canada are all experiencing death rates in excess of pre-2020 rates. All those countries were heavily vaxxed. BizNews of January 16, 2023, noted a massive spike in sudden deaths of athletes – 673 deaths between January 2021 and January 2022.

The shocking truth about the Big Pharma vax has come to light from a redacted email of January 30, 2021 obtained via the Freedom of Information Act in the US. The email recorded a discussion between Dr Fauci and Rochelle Walensky, then Director of the Centre for Disease Control, in which they expressed awareness of the dangers of the mRNA vax while at the same time coercing people to submit to it (see: World Net Daily, June 21, 2023).

The case brought by the HPCSA against Dr Chetty is not about science. It’s about compliance with protocols that suppress science. Dr Chetty is to be commended for upholding science.

The post Dr Chetty Is A Defender Of Science appeared first on Alt News Network.

264 adverse events following immunizations (AEFIs) were recorded for every 100,000 COVID-19 vaccines provided, according to the state’s vaccine safety surveillance report (pdf).

The COVID-19 vaccines are 23.8 times more likely to cause adverse events than non-COVID-19 vaccines, with 11.1 AEFIs being reported for all other immunizations.

The rate of adverse events varied among different types of COVID-19 vaccines.

The Spikevax (Moderna) vaccine recorded 281.4 AEFIs per 100,000 doses, Comirnaty (Pfizer) recorded 244.8, and the Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) vaccine, which was removed from the vaccine program after reports emerged of blood clotting in younger people, recorded 306.

Adverse events following vaccination can range from mild, such as a sore arm, to serious conditions, such as anaphylaxis, thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndrome (TTS), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), myocarditis, and pericarditis.

Collaboration Continues With 3-in-1 Super Jab

Meanwhile, despite these concerns, the Australian government’s partnership with Moderna to produce vaccines using experimental messenger RNA technology to prepare for the next pandemic means these vaccines are here to stay.

The company has been forming a trifecta jab to address the main respiratory viruses—influenza, COVID-19, and RSV to maintain its market share amid the falling revenue of vaccine companies as the health crisis subsides.

Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine sales of US$18.4 billion in 2022 are expected to dive to $5 billion this year.

Recently, it was granted expedited approval by Australia’s authority for medicines for its mRNA-1345 (RSV vaccine), meaning that the company will be able to launch the vaccines in Australia before any other country in the world.

A spokesperson from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration told the Epoch Times that Moderna was granted an accelerated approval process on March 30 after satisfying all of the following criteria:

• • the medicine is new
  • the medicine is for the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a life-threatening condition
  • no other medicines that are intended to treat, prevent or diagnose the condition are included in the Australian drug register or there is substantial evidence that this medicine provides a significant improvement in efficacy or safety of the treatment, prevention or diagnosis of the condition compared to those goods already included in the register
  • there is substantial evidence that the medicine provides a major therapeutic advance.

However, phase 3 clinical trials for Moderna’s mRNA version of the seasonal influenza vaccine have been underwhelming, showing a high rate of side effects.

Although the vaccine generates a strong immune response against the A strains of the flu, its efficacy against B strains is not better than existing approved vaccines.

Additionally, 70 percent of trial participants who received the shot reported adverse reactions such as headaches, swelling, and fatigue compared to 48 percent for the conventional flu vaccine.

The post COVID Vaccines Show 24 Times More Adverse Reactions Than Others appeared first on Alt News Network.

• “One of the things we’re researching is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could make — preemptively produce new vaccines, right?” said Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations – mRNA Scientific Planner. That is what we must do. However, there is a risk involved if we do that. As you can understand, nobody wants a pharmaceutical firm-altering virus.
• Don’t tell anyone, Walker warned. Make a commitment not to inform anyone. The experiment would include infecting monkeys with the virus, causing them to keep infecting each other, and then taking serial samples from them.
• Walker: “You have to be really cautious to make sure that the COVID virus you mutate doesn’t produce anything that spreads indiscriminately. To be honest, I believe that this is how the virus first appeared in Wuhan. The sudden appearance of this pathogen defies logic. It is nonsense.”
• “From what I’ve heard, they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [the COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is extremely cautious — clearly they don’t want to accelerate it too quickly,” said Walker. Since it is evident that you do not want to announce that you are researching potential future mutations, I believe they are also just attempting to do it as an exploratory thing.

NEW YORK – 25 January 2023: Jordon Trishton Walker, a Pfizer executive, reveals that his company is looking into ways to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” in order to delay the creation of subsequent vaccines. Project Veritas has now released a new video exposing Walker.

1,000,000+ views in 90 minutes #DirectedEvolution setting the internet on fire 🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/xaRvlD5qTo

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) January 26, 2023

According to Walker, Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that imparts new or enhanced activity on a protein,” is distinct from directed evolution. In other words, it implies that, depending on the mutation or scientific experiment carried out on it, a virus like COVID may become more potent.

The Pfizer executive discussed his company’s plans for COVID vaccines with a Veritas journalist while noting that if this information became public, people would not be pleased.

“One of the things Pfizer is investigating is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could build — produce new vaccines beforehand, right? That is what we must do. But if we do that, there’s a risk that, as you might guess, nobody wants a pharmaceutical corporation altering viruses,” Walker added.

According to what I’ve heard, the COVID mutation process is being optimized by Pfizer experts, but they’re moving slowly since everyone is being quite cautious — clearly, they don’t want to accelerate it too quickly. You obviously don’t want to publicize that you are figuring out future mutations, so I believe they are just trying to do it as an experimental activity,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walker: Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist: Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker: Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist: What do you mean if it works?

Walker: Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist: Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker: Yeah, it’d be perfect.

Walker continued by outlining how it is not in the interests of the American people for Big Pharma and government officials, such as those at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], to have common goals:

Walker: [Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist: Wow.

Walker: In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs — eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.

Veritas Journalist: How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker: It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist: Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker: Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

Source: Project Veritas

The post Watch: Pfizer Executive Admits On Camera ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ To Profit From Vaccines appeared first on Alt News Network.

The so-called experts were responsible for following the dictates of Big Pharma to negate science in plunging South Africa into lockdowns, masks and vaccines when science decreed that the effects of those measures were worse than Covid itself. These so-called experts ignored the voices of scientific integrity exemplified by the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration – Dr Martin Kulldorf of Harvard, Dr Sunetra Gupta of Oxford and Dr Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford, along with 60,000 scientists and medical doctors – who bravely debunked the Big Pharma/ globalist narrative.

The opinion of one of the “experts,” Professor Nigel Garrett quoted in The Mercury’s report, is particularly relevant seeing as he and two of his colleagues, Drs Lessells and Msomi, conducted a workshop last July in which they ardently promoted masks and vaxxing. They were challenged in these columns on August 22 to respond to the irrefutable evidence that their prescriptions were misleading and contrary to science. Their failure to respond was not surprising given the sources of funding upon which their research institutions rely.

In terms of the bigger picture, what needs to be appreciated is the agenda underlying what is being propagated as pandemics. By promoting fear and alarm, the objective is population control. Although it has been conceded that Covid-19 was nothing more than the virulent flu from which 99% of those infected survived, the ulterior motive of those in Big Pharma, the WHO, the CDC, the bought politicians and scientists, is to coerce the masses into having the concoction called “the vaccine.”

Irrefutable proof of the fact that the so-called vaccines are hazardous to health is available from the statistics of the passive vaccine adverse effects reporting system (VAERS). More than 30,000 people have died from the jab, and over 500,000 have experienced extreme illness and impairment.

Yet, the likes of Professor Garrett and Adrian Gore of Discovery (see: Biznews, January 6) insist on promoting vaxxing, despite proof that it neither prevents re-infection nor produces immunity. Worse still, vaxxing and boosters are depleting natural immunity which is why ill health afflicts the vaxxed far more than the unvaxxed.

Journalist Brian Pottinger’s appeal, made last February, for a TRC-type investigation into the Covid, pandemic, and vax narrative, is overdue.

The post Covid “Experts” Deserve Disdain appeared first on Alt News Network.

Gottlieb funnelled his demands using the same Twitter lobbyist the White House did – fresh evidence of overlap between Pfizer selling mRNA shots and the government forcing them on the public.

Gottlieb, a Pfizer director, on August 27, 2021, noticed a tweet that pushed against his narrative (that of making a profit). Claiming this tweet could hurt the sales of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines.

The tweet correctly explained that natural immunity was superior to vaccine immunity.

This tweet came from Dr Brett Giroir, a physician who had briefly followed Gottlieb as the head of the Food & Drug Administration.

This suggestion could raise questions about the shots. 

Stepping in, Gottlieb emailed Todd O’Boyle, a top lobbyist in Twitter’s Washington office and Twitter’s point of contact with The White House.

Gottlieb wrote, “The Post was ‘corrosive.'” and continued to cite, “…this tweet will end up going viral and driving news coverage.” It was clear Gottlieb did not want this out.

It’s now clear #COVID19 natural immunity is superior to #vaccine immunity, by ALOT. There’s no science justification for #vax proof if a person had prior infection. @CDCDirector @POTUS must follow the science. If no previous infection? Get vaccinated! https://t.co/jFc0yHpF2f

— Brett Giroir (@DrGiroir) August 28, 2021

Since the release of the Twitter Files, it is clear Elon will not leave one stone unturned. Since Elon gained Twitter, he has continued to release internal communication between the leading authorities and Twitter. 

A recent Substack article written by Alex Berenson goes into more detail on this topic. He found the email in a search for records he ran on Twitter last week. 

O’Boyle forwarded the email to Twitter’s “Strategic Response” team, failing to mention that Gottlieb was a Pfizer board member with financial interests in pushing the mRNA shots. 

A week later, Gottlieb struck again, complaining to O’boyle about a tweet from Justin Hart, who had a Twitter following of over 100,000.

The tweet read. “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but a viral pathogen with a child mortality rate of <>0% has cost our children nearly three years of schooling,”.

Sticks and stones may break my bones but a viral pathogen with a child mortality rate of ~0% has cost our children nearly three years of schooling. 😡

— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) September 4, 2021

This time, though, Gottlieb’s complaint fell on deaf ears. 

At the same time, Gottlieb was pressing Twitter to act against Berenson, who disclosed on Substack on October 13, 2022, drawing on documents that Twitter’s pre-Musk regime provided him with as part of a lawsuit against Twitter. 

In an interview with CNBC, Gottlieb did not deny pressing Twitter on Berenson.

“I’ve raised concerns about social media and the threats that are being made on these platforms,” says @ScottGottliebMD on Alex Berenson being kicked off Twitter. “I’m unconcerned about debate being made. I’m concerned about physical threats being made for people’s safety.” pic.twitter.com/hxpALiT6dZ

— Squawk Box (@SquawkCNBC) October 14, 2022

As it turns out, Gottlieb is not just a Pfizer board member.

He is one of seven members of the board’s executive committee and the head of its regulatory and compliance committee, which oversees “compliance with laws, regulations, and internal procedures applicable to pharmaceutical sales and marketing activities.”

Pfizer has a long history of violating drug industry laws and ethics rules. In 2009, it agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest healthcare fraud settlement in American history, for fraudulently marketing several drugs.

In 1996, it conducted a clinical trial of an antibiotic in Nigeria in which 11 children died and which became the inspiration for John le Carre’s novel, The Constant Gardner.

How will Pfizer react to the black-and-white proof from Twitter’s records that one of its most influential board members secretly tried to suppress debate on the mRNA jabs that have been by far its best-selling product since 2020?

The post Twitter Files: Pfizer Board Member Pressed Twitter To Hide Posts On Natural Immunity appeared first on Alt News Network.

Professor Nigel Garrett and Dr Richard Lessells, both associated with UKZN medical research, extolled the virtues of being vaxxed and even claimed that the unvaxxed had a “six times higher risk of dying.” Lessells was reported as saying “no vaccine has become ineffective.” Their colleague, Dr Nokukhanya Msomi, insisted that “the vaccines are safe.”

But this past week, two sources from within the US medical establishment have revealed that what Garrett, Lessells and Msomi claimed, is specious. Compelled by a US court in January to release all documentation relating to its vaccine by August, the latest tranche of Pfizer documents discloses shocking information about the effects of the vaccine on a trial group of 50 women.

Miscarriages were suffered by 22 of the group, some 44%. Although that was known by the FDA, it nevertheless promoted the vaccine. Pfizer, for its part, ignored the deaths of the infants and dismissed the occurrences as “recovered-resolved adverse effects.”

If the vaccines are “safe,” how come the CDC’s passive, reported data, VAERS –vaccine adverse effects reporting system – shows monthly growth in the number of deaths and serious adverse effects?  For example, the VAERS report for August 2021 showed 13,068 deaths. To date, the number of deaths has risen to 30,162 with 251,075 serious, vax health consequences.

In its attempt to walk back the narrative of alarmism and falsehoods it propagated about Covid and the vaccines, the CDC has dropped its stance on quarantine and social distancing and acknowledged that vaxxing does not protect from Covid infection. As if to emphasise the latter, Biden, Obama and Hillary Clinton, despite multiple vaxxing, all have had Covid again along with four -times vaxxed Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla.

In a further radical revision of the narrative, the new CDC guidelines have ended health discrimination between the vaxxed and the unvaxxed. In attempting to project a contrite stance, CDC Director, Dr Rochelle Welensky, says the mRNA vax “will be rigorously evaluated for safety.”  A bit late, for all those who have died and are suffering from it. What happened to Welensky’s exhortation –‘trust the science’?

In Europe, the EU Medicines Agency has demanded the placement of health warnings concerning myocarditis and pericarditis on Novavax boxes. The UK Office for National Statistics confirmed that up to July the mortality rates per 100,000 were the lowest for the unvaxxed in every age group but that the mortality gap between them and the vaxxed was increasing by the month.

On the basis of these developments, can we expect a published revision of the opinions of the three UKZN medical scientists?

The post UKZN Scientists Challenged appeared first on Alt News Network.

To protect patients, ‘Susan’ shares harrowing experiences of C19 patient trauma and post jab injuries including heart attacks, brain damage and death.

According to Susan, 300 C19 patients who died could have been saved had the hospital changed their protocols and avoided drugs like Midazolam. Adding to the impact is the targeting and victimisation of staff who dare to speak out for their patients.

Source: Rumble (Trial Site News)

The post Whistleblower: Nurse Reveals COVID-19 Patient Mistreatment & Vaccine Injuries appeared first on Alt News Network.

Aimed at “debunking the myths about becoming fully vaccinated against the killer disease,” there is not a shred of evidence to support any of your claims. In the first place, Covid-19 is not a killer disease because 99% of those infected recovered. There is no precise figure for the numbers who died of Covid in South Africa because no distinction was made between two key prepositions: of or with Covid, nor were co-morbidities taken into account. Flu and pneumonia cases were included to bump up the data to contrive the “pandemic.”

In any event, your belief in what is a drug that has never been subjected to standard years of testing is deplorable. As FDA vax cheerleader, Dr Paul Offil, has acknowledged, “FDA decisions are based on political pressure, not science.” The Deputy Director of the EU Medicines Agency, Noel Wathion, concurs that the terms “approved” and “authorised” regarding the vaccines are not scientific. According to the thousands of pages of data Pfizer was compelled to release by court order, by August 2021 they knew their vax was neither safe nor effective.

Former Pfizer Vice President, Dr Michael Yeadon, an experienced scientist, says the Pharma industry knew all along that the vax would not work, yet chose to use spike protein despite realising its acute danger. “My peers on the inside knew this. It was not an accident.”

There is no scientific basis for Dr Msomi’s promotion of mask-wearing. The Brownstone Institute in the US compiled 400 independent studies debunking the role of masks in preventing transmission of the Covid virus. Dr Martin Kulldorf of Harvard, Dr Sunetra Gupta of Oxford and Dr Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford are the founders of what is called the Great Barrington Declaration, authored on October 4, 2020. The Declaration is highly critical of Covid lockdown, mask-wearing and vaccine coercion and is endorsed by 15,468 medical scientists and 45,609 medical practitioners from Europe, North America, India, New Zealand and Israel. South Dakota and North Dakota provide a significant case of the efficacy of mask-wearing: South Dakota never mandated masks yet its rate of Covid deaths was far lower than mask-mandated North Dakota.

How do you account for the flip-flops of the pandemic guru, Dr Anthony Fauci, on mask-wearing? In March 2020, he said wearing was purely voluntary. In May 2020 he said they were necessary. Late in January 2021 he advocated double masking then a week later back-pedalled from that standpoint. Regardless of what type of mask is worn or from what it is manufactured, the apertures in the weave average 70 to 80 microns in size. The size of the virus is less than five microns. So masks are as ineffective in preventing the passage of the virus as a chain-link fence is in keeping out mosquitoes.

Professor Garrett’s assertion that “the unvaccinated have a six times higher risk of dying and experiencing severe disease” is utterly without foundation. A 14-month study done in Qatar in collaboration with Cornell University showed that the natural immunity of the unvaxxed was 97% effective against severe Covid. A 16-month study by the UK Health Dept showed that vaxxing is ineffective in preventing transmission while causing depletion of natural immunity. The latest New England Medical Journal notes that the unvaxxed are far less prone to Covid re-infection than the vaxxed. Haiti, where no vaxxing took place, has the lowest Covid infection in the world.

The stark reality of the effect of Covid vaxxing is being demonstrated increasingly in all the heavily vaxxed countries: rising death rates among the vaxxed; increased hospitalisations; increasing infection rates; unprecedented increases in heart ailments amongst the 16 to 39 age group; diminished fertility rates in Germany, Taiwan, North Dakota; unprecedented increases in miscarriages, foetal abnormalities, menstrual irregularities. The consensus amongst doctors ranging from the US College of Obstetrics to UK doctors is that vaxxing small children is extremely harmful and should not happen. In Ireland, heart disease has suddenly rocketed amongst vaxxed children. In Uruguay, a judge halted the vaxxing of children for similar reasons.

Another significant occurrence is what is called, “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome”. Between March 2021 and March 2022, 769 athletes suffered cardiac arrest. The international football federation FIFA recorded the sudden deaths of 21 players this past year. Lincoln, the fifth largest life insurance company in the US, has recorded an unprecedented rise in life insurance claims since vaxxing commenced. A current study done at Waikato University, New Zealand, by Prof John Gibson, based on weekly government data, found that those who had booster shots recorded a 10% higher death rate. Rising excess mortality in New Zealand is coinciding with booster shots. The latest death statistics in the UK show that 91% of cases were triple or quadruple vaxxed.

All of this data is authentic and publicly available, yet it is not published by the mainstream media which begs the question: why? The answer, freely available from sources such as RF Kennedy’s The Defender, the Epoch Times and World Net Daily, is that there is collusion between governments, drug companies and the mass media.

For example, in June the Biden regime signed a $3,2 billion deal with Pfizer to produce 105 million doses of its new, untested, re-formulated vax. Despite the risks involved, Biden Health secretary Xavier Becerra falsely claims the new vax will “protect people from serious illness.”

Whilst your credentials as scientists are not questioned, what begs questioning is why you propagate information that is unfounded? Research of the relationships many American scientists, doctors and institutions have with major pharmaceutical companies provides the answer: abide by the narrative or lose your funding.

It is a fact that your research, directly and indirectly, enjoys funding from a range of overseas sources. The US National Institute of Health is a government agency whose Director was once Dr Fauci. The Wellcome Trust provides funds through GlaxoSmithKline. The SAMRC, your major funder, is partnered by Forte of Sweden and the Newton Fund of the UK. In addition, medical research in South Africa enjoys funding from the Gates Foundation, the EU and Johnson & Johnson.

Conspicuously absent from your strenuous advocacy of the so-called vaccines, but not surprisingly, is any reference to the proven, inexpensive product called Ivermectin. The American Journal of Therapeutics, Vol. 28, July/August 2021, pp. 434-460, provides incontrovertible evidence that Ivermectin has “a strong therapeutic efficacy” against Covid-19. It found that doses of Ivermectin were 86% effective in reducing Covid infection and removed the need for mechanical ventilation. A related study found that Ivermectin reduced deaths amongst hospitalised Covid cases by 75%.

The Journal of Therapeutics argues that in the absence of the development of a cure for Covid-19, the repurposing of Ivermectin should be a priority. In Mexico and Peru Ivermectin has been officially endorsed as a Covid fighter. The Indian state of Uttar Pradesh with a population of 240 million, recorded a 98,7% recovery rate from Covid thanks to Ivermectin.

The purpose of this address to you is to appeal to your consciences and to your sense of integrity. If you ignore this appeal, you should consider the extent to which you have contributed to the real pandemic – the pandemic of the vax which, as Pfizer’s court-ordered data indicates, has more than 1,000 possible adverse effects, the most critical being depletion of natural immunity and fatal heart cases. The facts contained in this appeal are not “myths and rumours,” as you aver. One does not have to be a scientist to appreciate the negative, indeed dangerous, effects of the so-called vaccines or the futility of mask-wearing and the socio-economic chaos of the utterly uncalled-for lockdowns.

A final, basic question: Vaccinations for polio and smallpox are given only once because they stimulate the necessary immunity. If a prescribed drug does not achieve what it claims after two administrations, how do you justify further applications of the same drug? In short, why do you encourage repeated doses of these so-called Covid vaccines which do not produce immunity? There is no logic in expecting a different result every time the same formula is applied.

Researched and compiled by Dr Duncan Du Bois, Durban, July 2022

The post Appeal to Professor Nigel Garrett, Dr Richard Lessells and Dr Nokukhanya Msomi appeared first on Alt News Network.