Justice for Peanut: Mark Longo Challenges New York’s Wildlife Laws After Pet Squirrel’s Tragic End
Peanut the Squirrel Seized and Euthanized, Owner Pursues Legal Battle
The heartbreaking case of Peanut the Squirrel has ignited a debate over wildlife ownership laws. After authorities in New York seized and euthanized Peanut, a pet squirrel with a huge social media following, his owner, Mark Longo, is preparing to take legal action against the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), challenging what he calls an unjustified and traumatic enforcement of state law.
Mark Longo’s journey with Peanut began seven years ago when he rescued the baby squirrel after its mother was killed. He raised Peanut as a pet, documenting their lives together on social media, where Peanut amassed over 500,000 followers. The squirrel quickly became an internet icon, bringing joy to thousands of fans who followed his antics.
The situation took a grim turn when DEC officers, acting on complaints, removed Peanut and a raccoon from Longo’s home, claiming that under New York law, the animals were illegally possessed and presented a rabies risk. The DEC cited these health concerns as their basis for euthanizing the animals, stating that wildlife ownership, even in controlled environments, poses potential dangers to the public.
Longo, however, contends that Peanut was well-cared for and did not present any public health risks. Describing the DEC’s response as “heavy-handed,” he argues that the seizure was avoidable and the euthanization unnecessary. In his push for justice, Longo has launched a petition demanding reform in New York’s wildlife laws, gathering tens of thousands of signatures from supporters who believe his case underscores a need for more compassionate regulations.
As Longo prepares his case, he hopes to shed light on what he sees as outdated, restrictive policies that fail to consider the unique circumstances of animals raised domestically. Longo’s goal is not only to fight for Peanut’s memory but also to advocate for broader changes that could protect other pet owners from similar losses.
Peanut’s story serves as a poignant reminder of the growing friction between wildlife laws and pet ownership rights. Longo’s upcoming legal challenge, bolstered by widespread public support, could become a landmark case for wildlife rights, urging states to reconsider the rigid boundaries imposed on pet owners with unconventional pets.